Fox v. Vice | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
Argued March 22, 2011 Decided June 6, 2011 |
||||||
Full case name | Fox v. Vice | |||||
Docket nos. | 10-114 | |||||
Argument | Oral argument | |||||
Opinion Announcment | Opinion announcement | |||||
Holding | ||||||
Reasonable fees maybe be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims. | ||||||
Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
Case opinions | ||||||
Majority | Kagen, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor |
Fox v. Vice, No. 10-114 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that reasonable fees maybe be granted to the defendant in a suit that involves both frivolous and non-frivolous claims, but only for costs resulting from the frivolous claims.[1]